This page shows accessible versions of tables from the UK Data Service’s Case Study on the Gender Equality Index UK. You can return to reading the Case Study here.
Figure 1 – Overview of domains, subdomains and indicators constituting the GEIUK
| Domain | Subdomain | Indicator |
| Paid Work | Employment | Employment rate |
| Supervisors and professionals | ||
| Quality of work | Progression opportunities | |
| Involvement in decision-making | ||
| Unpaid Work | Care and domestic work | Daily childcare |
| Weekly domestic work | ||
| Money | Pay | Weekly median pay |
| Not in low pay | ||
| Home equity | Homeowners with a mortgage | |
| Power & Participation | Leadership | Company leadership |
| Councillors | ||
| Participation | Participation in civil society | |
| Voted in the general election | ||
| Education | Qualifications | Level 4 qualifications or above |
| Skills | English GCSE | |
| Maths GCSE | ||
| Health | Life expectancy and
good health |
Life expectancy |
| Healthy life years | ||
| Good health |
You can return to reading the Case Study here.
Figure 2 – Description of the types of gender equality found based on average demographic and socioeconomic variables
| Type of gender equality | Prime parity | Equal erosion | Partial progress | Deep disparities |
| Description | Highest gender equality and outcomes | High gender equality but poor outcomes | Moderate gender equality and outcomes | Low gender equality and poor outcomes |
| Example local authority | Guildford, St Albans, Wandsworth |
Blackpool, Neath Port Talbot, Stoke-on-Trent |
Canterbury, Midlothian, South Somerset |
Bradford, Merthyr Tydfil, Derry City and Strabane |
| Top regional concentration | South East, East of England, London |
North West, Wales, West Midlands |
South East, Scotland, South West |
Yorkshire and the Humber, Wales, Northern Ireland |
| Gender Equality Measure | High | High | Medium | Low |
| Women’s Outcomes Measure | High | Low | Medium | Low |
| Men’s Outcomes Measure | High | Low | Medium | Low |
| Productivity | High | Low | Medium | Low |
| Economic activity | High | Low | Medium | Low |
| Deprivation | Low | High | Medium | High |
You can return to reading the Case Study here.