This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice


Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.


Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you’re visiting the site.

The effect of infertility and its treatment on child health and development

Author: Claire Carson
Institution: University of Oxford
Type of case study: Research

About the research

This study explores the separate effects of pregnancy planning, time to conception and infertility treatment on a range of child health and development outcomes measured at age 3 and 5 years in a national cohort study (the Millennium Cohort Study). Unadjusted test scores at ages 3 and 5 indicate that children born after an unplanned pregnancy are four to five months behind planned children in verbal abilities, while children born after assisted reproduction are three to four months ahead. However, adjusted analyses show that pregnancy planning, sub-fertility, or assisted reproduction do not adversely affect children’s cognitive development at age 3 or 5. The report concludes that these differences observed in the unadjusted analyses are almost entirely explained by marked inequalities in socioeconomic circumstances between the groups. Based on these findings, the authors write that “To help children achieve their full potential, policy makers should continue to target social inequalities.”

Methodology

Data on pregnancy planning, time to conception and infertility treatment were collected in the MCS First Survey. This was used to construct our exposure groups. We also used data on many baseline characteristics from this dataset. The cognitive outcome measures we used were subscales from the British Ability Scales drawn from the MCS Second and Third Survey. The BAS subscales are continuous variables. These were analysed using linear regression, controlling for potential confounding and mediating factors. Our measure of effect was difference in mean score, which was converted into the equivalent difference in months. The data were analysed using survey methods in Stata 11, which allowed us to take into account the stratified, clustered study design of the MCS and use weights for loss to follow up.

Publications

You can read media coverage of this study in the The Telegraph and two peer-reviewed publications:
Carson C., et al. (2011) Effect of pregnancy planning and fertility treatment on cognitive outcomes in children at ages 3 and 5: longitudinal cohort study, BMJ, 26.
Carson C., et al. (2010) Cognitive development following ART: effect of choice of comparison group, confounding and mediating factors, Hum. Reprod. Jan.